Legislative Bargaining and Coalition Formation
نویسنده
چکیده
1 This is a revised version of the first chapter of my dissertation and I stand in great debt to my dissertation supervisor Andrew Postlewaite, Stephen Coate, and Stephen Morris for comments, suggestions, encouragement, and patience. Two referees and an associate editor provided detailed comments and criticism that led to significant improvements of the paper. I also thank George Mailath, Andrea Moro, Motty Perry, Torsten Persson, and seminar participants at the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Wisconsin, IIES Stockholm, IUI Stockholm, and the University of Essex for useful comments. The usual disclaimer applies. Peter Norman
منابع مشابه
The Executive Toolbox: Building Legislative Support in a Multiparty Presidential Regime
How do presidents win legislative support under conditions of extreme multipartism? Comparative presidential research has offered two parallel answers, one relying on distributive politics and the other claiming that legislative success is a function of coalition formation. The authors merge these insights in an integrated approach to executive-legislative relations while also considering dynam...
متن کاملA Model of Endogenous Government Formation
Political parties bargain over the allocation of cabinet portfolios when forming coalition governments. Non-cooperative theories of legislative bargaining typically predict that the “formateur” enjoys a disproportionate share of government ministry positions. However, empirical evidence indicates that parties receive shares of portfolios proportional to their share of legislative seats that a g...
متن کاملPolar Coalitions in a Legislative Bargaining Game
Abstract. This paper considers an alternating offer legislative bargaining game with heterogeneous ideological preferences modeled as ideal points on an interval. The main contribution is a framework for measuring two forces that typically give proposers incentive to form coalitions out of either the left or right halves of the ideological spectrum “polar coalitions”. For a benchmark model with...
متن کاملThe Conditional Impact of Incumbency on Government Formation
Previous research on coalition politics has found an “incumbency advantage” in government formation, but it has provided no clear explanation as to why this advantage exists. We classify existing theories as either preference-based or institutions-based explanations for why incumbent coalitions might be likely to form again, and we integrate these explanations into a coherent theoretical argume...
متن کاملVoting Weights and Formateur Advantages in the Formation of Coalition Governments1
Over the last two decades a large and important literature has emerged that uses game theoretic models of bargaining to study legislative coalitions. To test key predictions of these models, we examine the composition of coalition governments from 1946 and 2001. These predictions are almost always expressed in terms of parties’ minimal integer voting weights. We calculate such weights for all p...
متن کاملDynamic Coalitions
Policy-making is a dynamic process in which policies can be changed in each period but continue in the absence of new legislation. We study a dynamic legislative bargaining game with an endogenous status quo where in each period a dollar is allocated with a proposal voted against the allocation in the previous period. We characterize for any initial status quo a class of simple Markov perfect e...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Economic Theory
دوره 102 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002